Editorial Comment on “Routine Sperm Cryopreservation Before Vasectomy Is not Cost-effective and Does not Increase Live Birth Rates Compared to Surgical Sperm Retrieval or Vasectomy Reversal” - 04/04/25
Doi : 10.1016/j.urology.2025.01.033
Darshan P. Patel ⁎ 
Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego, CA
⁎Address correspondence to: Darshan P. Patel, M.D., Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, 9333 Genesee Avenue, Suite 320, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92121.Department of Urology, University of California San Diego9333 Genesee Avenue, Suite 320, La JollaSan DiegoCA92121
Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.
Mappa
© 2025
Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Vol 198
P. 47 - aprile 2025 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente
- Routine Sperm Cryopreservation Before Vasectomy Is not Cost-effective and Does not Increase Live Birth Rates Compared to Surgical Sperm Retrieval or Vasectomy Reversal
- Bradley J. Roth, Andrew D. Shumaker, Petar Bajic, Sarah C. Vij, Pietro E. Bortoletto, Scott D. Lundy
- Reply to Editorial Comment on “Routine Sperm Cryopreservation Before Vasectomy Is not Cost-effective and Does not Increase Live Birth Rates Compared to Surgical Sperm Retrieval or Vasectomy Reversal”
- Bradley J. Roth, Scott D. Lundy
Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.
Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?