Abbonarsi

Comparative effectiveness of various exercise interventions on central sensitisation indices: A systematic review and network meta-analysis - 31/05/25

Doi : 10.1016/j.rehab.2024.101894 
Aya Abd Elkhabir Ibrahim a, b, , Daniel F. McWilliams a, c, Stephanie L. Smith a, Wendy J. Chaplin a, c, Mitra Salimian d, Vasileios Georgopoulos a, Afroditi Kouraki c, David A. Walsh a, c
a Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK 
b Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt 
c Nottingham NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK 
d Health Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK 

Corresponding author at: Academic Rheumatology, Clinical Science Building, Nottingham City Hospital, University of Nottingham, NG5 1PB Nottingham, UK.Academic RheumatologyClinical Science BuildingNottingham City HospitalUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamNG5 1PBUK

Abstract

Background

Central sensitisation (CS) increases musculoskeletal pain. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) or self-report questionnaires might indicate CS. Indices of CS might be suppressed by exercise, although the optimal exercise regimen remains unclear.

Objectives

We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to investigate effectiveness of different exercise regimens on these CS indices in adults.

Methods

We searched 6 electronic databases from inception to November 2023. Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigated effects of exercise on all CS indices. Two independent reviewers assessed risk of bias. NMA of RCTs compared CS indices between exercise types. Sensitivity analysis using only high-quality studies was performed to verify the robustness of our results. Certainty was assessed using the GRADE approach.

Results

Of the 249 eligible studies identified, 164 were RCTs, of which 89 provided data suitable for NMA. Meta-analysis revealed large improvement of post-intervention CS indices compared to baseline (SMD −0.81, 95 % CI −0.93 to −0.70). All reported categories of exercise, except stretching exercise alone, were more effective than non-exercise controls. Combined exercises that include stretching together with strengthening exercises (SMD −1.67, 95 % Credible Interval (CrI) −2.41 to −0.97), or strengthening, stretching and aerobic components (SMD −1.61, 95 % CrI −2.74 to −0.56) were most effective at reducing CS indices compared to non-exercise controls. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of our findings, particularly for combined stretching and strengthening exercise.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis suggested that various exercise interventions are effective in improving CS. Multi-component exercise tends to be the most effective, but some exercise combinations might be better than others. Combined exercise featuring strengthening and stretching components, with or without aerobic exercise, shows the greatest likelihood among other combinations of being the optimal exercise type. These findings might have utility informing future trials and personalising treatment strategies for people with CS features.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Network meta-analysis, Central sensitisation, Exercise, Pain


Mappa


© 2024  The Authors. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 68 - N° 4

Articolo 101894- maggio 2025 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Effect of virtual reality therapy on pain relief in sports rehabilitation for young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Elyn Toh, Si Qi Yoong, Olivia Win Myint, Qian Ning Leong, Ying Jiang
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Comment on ‘‘Percutaneous needle tenotomies: Indications, procedures, efficacy and safety. A systematic review” by H. Bessaguet et al. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2024;67(5):101,839
  • Ignacio Martínez-Caballero, María Galán-Olleros, Sergio Lerma-Lara

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.