Abbonarsi

Is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary for anterior epistaxis with packing? Insights from a large database - 24/06/25

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.03.040 
Quincy K. Tran, MD, PhD a, b, d, , Isha Vashee b, Rohan Vanga b, Samantha Camp c , Melissa K. Rallo c , Daniel Najafali f , Laura J. Bontempo, MD, MEd a , Ali Pourmand, MD, MPH e
a Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States 
b Research Associate Program in Emergency Medicine & Critical Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States 
c University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States 
d Program In Trauma, The R Adam Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States 
e Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, United States 
f Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States 

Corresponding author at: 22 South Greene Street, Suite T3n45, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States. 22 South Greene Street, Suite T3n45 Baltimore MD 21201 United States

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with spontaneous epistaxis frequently receive anterior nasal packing (ANP) when bleeding is not controlled by other measures in the emergency department (ED). Many patients also receive prophylactic antibiotics (Abx), although the evidence about their benefits mostly derived from small studies, is unclear. This study aimed to leverage a large international database to investigate the prevalence of clinically significant infection (CSI) among patients with ANP who received prophylactic Abx.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis from TriNetX which includes 130 million patients. All adult patients who underwent ANP for spontaneous epistaxis were eligible. The intervention was prophylactic Abx within one day of the index ED visits; outcomes were 30-day rate of CSI, and adverse drug events (ADE). We utilized TriNetX's propensity score matching using demographic and clinical variables to match patients prior to comparing their outcomes.

Results

6302 patients were eligible for analysis, mean age (±SD) for both groups was 65 (±19 years), 42 % being female. The CSI analysis included 5487 patients, 2737 (50 %) receiving Abx. Total rate of CSI was 25 (0.45 %) patients, 15 (0.5 %) among patients with prophylactic Abx compared with 10 (0.4 %) CSI for those without Abx (Risk Difference 0.2 %, 95 % CI -0.005 to 0.002, p  = 0.31). There were 26 (1 %) patients with ADE per group (Risk Difference 0, 95 % CI -0.005 to 0.006, p  = 0.94).

Conclusion

The results from this large group of patients demonstrated that the rates of CSI and ADE among patients with anterior nasal packing for spontaneous epistaxis were low. We recommend against the practice of prophylactic antibiotics in anterior nasal packing, since the practice provides little benefit while posing a potential risk to the population.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Anterior nasal packing, Clinically significant infection, Prophylactic antibiotics, Epistaxis


Mappa


© 2025  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 93

P. 64-72 - luglio 2025 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • External validation of three scores for predicting prehospital return of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
  • Cheng-Yi Fan, Edward Pei-Chuan Huang, Chun-Hsiang Huang, Sih-Shiang Huang, Chien-Tai Huang, Yi-Ju Ho, Ching-Yu Chen, Chi-Hsin Chen, Chun-Ju Lien, Wei-Tien Chang, Chih-Wei Sung
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Evaluation of limiting PEEP effectiveness in preventing barotrauma in critically ill COVID-19 patients: A retrospective study
  • Yuhei Irie, Yoshito Izutani, Junta Noake, Shun Ninomiya, Mami Kastumura, Maiko Nakashio, Junichi Maruyama, Yoshihiko Nakamura, Hiroyasu Ishikura

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.