Comparative efficacy of cognitive training modalities in cognitive impairment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis - 24/07/25

Doi : 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100207 
Li-bing Liang a, 1 , Shan Wang a, 1 , Kun-peng Li b, 2, , Cai-qin Wu a, 2,
a School of Nursing, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China 
b School of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China 

Corresponding authors.

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
Articolo gratuito.

Si connetta per beneficiarne

Highlights

First network meta-analysis identifies reminiscence therapy (RT) as most effective cognitive training for global cognition across subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia.
RT’s neuroplasticity benefits: Linked to autobiographical memory networks and hippocampal-prefrontal connectivity, critical for Alzheimer’s prevention.
Cognitive strategy training (CST) improves language and immediate memory, supporting personalized rehabilitation in early cognitive decline.
Community scalability: cognitive training (CT) efficacy unaffected by duration, format, or expertise, enabling broad implementation.
Standardized CT definitions: Rigorous synthesis of 43 RCTs guides precision prevention trials.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abstract

Background

Cognitive training is a widely utilized non-pharmacological intervention to enhance cognitive performance in individuals with cognitive impairment. Despite its potential, significant ambiguity remains regarding its definition, optimal modalities, and design parameters. It remains unclear which types of cognitive training are relatively optimal for different levels of cognitive impairment or how intervention designs can maximize therapeutic benefits.

Objectives

This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of various cognitive training modalities on cognitive, psychological, and quality-of-life outcomes in individuals with cognitive impairment. Additionally, it sought to identify optimal intervention approaches, clarify key design parameters, and examine critical factors influencing treatment efficacy.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted across 12 databases from the establishment of the database until October 24, 2024, to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating cognitive training interventions. Data were analyzed using pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis in Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 18.

Results

Totally 43 RCTs were included. Pairwise meta-analysis revealed that cognitive strategy training demonstrated superior to active control (AC) or passive control (PC) in improving language function, immediate memory, depressive symptoms and quality of life. However, no significant effects were detected regarding cognitive impairment severity, delivery format, interventionist expertise level, training duration, or control type. Network meta-analysis further identified reminiscence therapy as the most pronounced effective intervention for improving global cognition across all stages of cognitive impairment.

Conclusions

Reminiscence therapy has been demonstrated as a relatively optimal cognitive training modality for enhancing cognitive function in individuals with varying levels of cognitive impairment. Future studies should prioritize longitudinal investigations to validate the durability of therapeutic benefits and incorporate neuroimaging and biomarker analyses to elucidate underlying mechanisms. High-quality RCTs remain imperative to strengthen the evidence base and evaluate the consistency of effects across diverse cognitive training interventions.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Cognitive training, Reminiscence therapy, Cognitive impairment, Systematic review, Network meta-analysis


Mappa


© 2025  Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 12 - N° 7

Articolo 100207- agosto 2025 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Using machine learning and electronic health record (EHR) data for the early prediction of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias
  • Sonia Akter, Zhandi Liu, Eduardo J. Simoes, Praveen Rao
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • The patient pathway for mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease in Asia: Current practices, barriers, and expert recommendations for optimization
  • Seong Hye Choi, SangYun Kim, Paulus Anam Ong, Ai Vyrn Chin, Jacqueline Dominguez, Christopher Li-Hsian Chen, Vorapun Senanarong, Chaur-Jong Hu, Manjari Tripathi, Vincent Mok, Gandan Jiang, Amitabh Dash

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.