Abbonarsi

Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium - 18/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.817 
François Goffinet, MD, PhD a, b, Marion Carayol, Midwife a, Jean-Michel Foidart, MD, PhD c, Sophie Alexander, MD, PhD d, Serge Uzan, MD e, Damien Subtil, MD, PhD f, Gérard Bréart, MD a, e

for the PREMODA Study Group

a INSERM U149, Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal Health and Women’s Health, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris VI, Hôpital Tenon 
b Université Paris-Descartes Paris 5, Faculté de médecine, Service de gynécologie et obstétrique de Port-Royal, Hôpital Cochin Saint-Vincent-de-Paul, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France 
c Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, La Citadelle Hospital, Liège, Belgium 
d School of Public Health School, Bruxelles, Belgium 
e Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tenon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris VI, France 
f Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, Lille Cedex, France 

Abstract

Objective

A large trial published in 2000 concluded that planned vaginal delivery of term breech births is associated with high neonatal risks. Because the obstetric practices in that study differed from those in countries where planned vaginal delivery is still common, we conducted an observational prospective study to describe neonatal outcome according to the planned mode of delivery for term breech births in 2 such countries.

Study design

Observational prospective study with an intent-to-treat analysis to compare the groups for which cesarean and vaginal deliveries were planned. Associations between the outcome and planned mode of delivery were controlled for confounding by multivariate analysis. The main outcome measure was a variable that combined fetal and neonatal mortality and severe neonatal morbidity. The study population consisted of 8105 pregnant women delivering singleton fetuses in breech presentation at term in 138 French and 36 Belgian maternity units.

Results

Cesarean delivery was planned for 5579 women (68.8%) and vaginal delivery for 2526 (31.2%). Of the women with planned vaginal deliveries, 1796 delivered vaginally (71.0%). The rate of the combined neonatal outcome measure was low in the overall population (1.59%; 95% CI [1.33-1.89]) and in the planned vaginal delivery group (1.60%; 95% CI [1.14-2.17]). It did not differ significantly between the planned vaginal and cesarean delivery groups (unadjusted odds ratio = 1.10, 95% CI [0.75-1.61]), even after controlling for confounding variables (adjusted odds ratio = 1.40, 95% CI [0.89-2.23]).

Conclusion

In places where planned vaginal delivery is a common practice and when strict criteria are met before and during labor, planned vaginal delivery of singleton fetuses in breech presentation at term remains a safe option that can be offered to women.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Key words : Breech presentation, Mode of delivery, Neonatal morbidity, Observational survey


Mappa


 Supported by 2 grants from the Ministry of Health (AOM01123 [PH-RC 2001] and AOM03040 [PH-RC 2003]). It was also partly funded by the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians, the French Society of Perinatal Medicine, and the Belgian National Funds for Scientific Research.
The funding sources had no role in the study design, data collection, data interpretation, or the writing of the report.
Reprints not available from the authors.


© 2006  Mosby, Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 194 - N° 4

P. 1002-1011 - aprile 2006 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data
  • Shagufta Yasmeen, Patrick S. Romano, Michael E. Schembri, Janet M. Keyzer, William M. Gilbert
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • The “PRIM” study: A randomized comparison of prostaglandin E2 gel with the nitric oxide donor isosorbide mononitrate for cervical ripening before the induction of labor at term
  • Inass Osman, Fiona MacKenzie, John Norrie, Heather M. Murray, Ian A. Greer, Jane E. Norman

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.