Abbonarsi

Lessons Learned From Clinical Anthrax Drills: Evaluation of Knowledge and Preparedness for a Bioterrorist Threat in Israeli Emergency Departments - 18/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.12.006 
Adi Leiba, MD a, Avi Goldberg, MD a, Ariel Hourvitz, MD, MHA a, Yoram Amsalem, MD b, Adi Aran, MD b, Gali Weiss, RN, MHA a, Ronit Leiba, MA c, Yoav Yehezkelli, MD, MHA b, Avishay Goldberg, PhD d, Yehezkel Levi, MD e, Yaron Bar-Dayan, MD, MHA a,
a Israeli Defense Forces Home Front Command, Ramat-Gan, Israel. 
b Israeli Defense Forces Medical Corps, Chemical Biological Radiological & Nuclear Medicine Branch, Ramat-Gan, Israel. 
c Department of Biostatistics, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel. 
d Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Beer-Sheva, Israel. 
e Surgeon General Headquarters, Israeli Defense Forces Medical Corps, Ramat-Gan, Israel. 

Address for correspondence: Y. Bar-Dayan, MD, MHA, Department of Healthcare Systems Management, the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel, 16 Dolev st. Neve Savion, Or-Yehuda, Israel; 972-5-077-86-215; fax 972-8-978-3200

Riassunto

Study objective

Emergency department (ED) physicians and nurses are considered critical sentinels of a bioterrorist attack. We designed a special hospital drill to test EDs’ response to inhalational anthrax and assess the level of preparedness for anthrax bioterrorism. We hypothesized that the occurrence of such a drill in an ED would improve the knowledge of its physicians, even those who had not actually participated in the drill.

Methods

We conducted 23 drills at all Israeli general hospitals’ EDs. An actor entered the walk-in triage area, simulating a febrile patient with lower respiratory complaints. A chest radiograph with mediastinal widening, as can be seen in early anthrax disease, was planted in the hospital’s imaging results system. Patients were instructed to give additional epidemiologic clues, such as having a few friends with a similar syndrome. Either before or after the drills, we distributed multiple choice tests about diagnosis and management of anthrax to the 115 senior emergency physicians at these hospitals.

Results

In 91% of EDs, a decision to admit the patient was made. Sixty-one percent included anthrax in the differential diagnosis and activated the appropriate protocols. Only 43% contacted all relevant officials. Average score on the anthrax tests was 58 (of 100). Physicians who were tested before the drill (in their institution) achieved a mean score of 54.5, whereas those who were tested after their ED had been exercised achieved a mean score of 59.3.

Conclusion

A national framework of drills on bioterrorism can help estimate and potentially augment national preparedness for bioterrorist threats. It is not, on its own, an effective educational tool. More emphasis should be given to formal accredited continuing medical education programs on bioterrorism, especially for emergency physicians and ED nurses, who will be in the front line of a bioterrorist attack.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


 Supervising editor: Jonathan L. Burstein, MD
Author contributions: AL, AG, AA, and YY planned the study. AL and AG conducted the study. AL planned drills, wrote the anthrax test, and wrote the article. AH participated in primary planning of the study as former Home Front Command chief medical officer. AL, AG, YA, AA, and YB-D were members in the expert committee of the study and participated in some of the drills. YA and AA evaluated the manuscript. GW and AG supervised the conduct of the study. YA, AA, and GW evaluated study results. RL was responsible for statistical analysis. RL and YB-D were responsible for quality control. YY was an expert consultant in CBRN medicine. YY and AG revised the manuscript. YL was chairman of the supervising committee of the study (Supreme Health Authority). YB-D revised the study plan and article. Y-BD was the research group leader and takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
Funding and support: The authors report this study did not receive any outside funding or support.
Publication dates: Available online February 2, 2006.
Reprints not available from the authors.


© 2006  American College of Emergency Physicians. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 48 - N° 2

P. 194 - agosto 2006 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Did you know?
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Did you know?

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.