Abbonarsi

Closing the Gap in Operative Performance Between Novices and Experts: Does Harder Mean Better for Laparoscopic Simulator Training? - 19/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.080 
Dimitrios Stefanidis, MD, PhD a, , James R. Korndorffer, MD, FACS b, Sarah Markley, BS b, Rafael Sierra, MD b, B. Todd Heniford, MD, FACS a, Daniel J. Scott, MD, FACS c
a Department of General Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC 
b Departments of Surgery, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 
c University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 

Correspondence address: Dimitrios Stefanidis, MD, PhD, Department of General Surgery, Division of GI and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1000 Blythe Blvd, MEB 601, Charlotte, NC 28211.

Riassunto

Background

We have previously shown that reaching expert performance on an fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS)-type simulator model for laparoscopic suturing results in measurable improvement during an actual operation; trained novices, however, demonstrate inferior operative performance compared with experts. We hypothesized that simulator training under more difficult and realistic conditions would enhance the operative performance of novices.

Study design

Medical students (n=32) participated in an IRB-approved, randomized, controlled trial. All participants were pretested in laparoscopic suturing on a previously validated porcine Nissen model and were randomized into three groups: group I (n=6) received no training, group II (n=13) trained on the FLS videotrainer model until a previously published proficiency score (512) was achieved on 2 consecutive and 10 additional attempts, group III (n=13) trained to the same goal but had to practice in a constrained space, with a shorter suture, starting with a dropped needle, and listening to operating room noise. Training workload was measured with the validated NASA-TLX (Task Load Index) questionnaire after each training session. All groups were posttested on the porcine model. Results were compared using ANOVA; p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

All group II and III participants reached the training goal. At posttesting, group II and group III participants performed similarly, but substantially better than group I did (210±140 versus 218±139 versus 0±0, respectively; p < 0.001). Compared with group II, group III participants trained longer (329±71 minutes versus 239±69 minutes, p < 0.001), performed more repetitions (81±15 versus 59±14, p < 0.001), and their workload improved less by the end of training (5% versus 23%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Proficiency-based simulator training reliably results in improved operative performance. Although increasing the level of training difficulty increased trainees’ workload, the strategy we used in this study did not enhance their operative performance. Other methods for curriculum optimization are needed.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


 Competing Interests Declared: None.


© 2007  American College of Surgeons. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 205 - N° 2

P. 307-313 - agosto 2007 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Incidental Appendectomy: 18-Year Pathologic Survey and Cost Effectiveness in the Nonmanaged-Care Setting
  • Jeffrey B. Albright, G. Peter Fakhre, William W. Nields, Philip P. Metzger
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Wearing Surgical Attire Outside the Operating Room: A Survey of Habits of Anesthesiologists and Surgeons in Israel
  • Avi A. Weinbroum, Tiberiu Ezri, Eithan Harow, Alexander Tsivian, Francis Serour

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.