Abbonarsi

Pulse versus continuous terbinafine for onychomycosis: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial - 21/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.04.055 
Erin M. Warshaw, MD, MS a, b, c, , Debra D. Fett, MD e, Hanna E. Bloomfield, MD, MPH a, b, d, Joseph P. Grill, MS a, b, David B. Nelson, PhD a, b, Vicente Quintero, MD f, Susan M. Carver, RN b, Gary R. Zielke, BS b, Frank A. Lederle, MD a, b, d
a From the Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research 
b Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center 
c Departments of Dermatology 
d Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota 
e Private practices in Palm Harbor, Florida 
f New Braunfels, Texas 

Correspondence to: Erin M. Warshaw, MD, Dept 111 K VAMC, Dermatology, 1 Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN 55417.

Minneapolis, Minnesota; Palm Harbor, Florida; and New Braunfels, Texas

Abstract

Background

Effective treatments for onychomycosis are expensive. Previous studies suggest that less costly, pulsed doses of antifungal medications may be as effective as standard, continuous doses. Terbinafine is the current treatment of choice for toenail onychomycosis.

Objective

Our purpose was to determine whether pulse-dose terbinafine is as effective as standard continuous-dose terbinafine for treatment of toenail onychomycosis.

Methods

We conducted a double-blind, randomized, noninferiority, clinical intervention trial in the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The main inclusion criteria for participants were a positive dermatophyte culture and at least 25% distal subungual clinical involvement. Six hundred eighteen volunteers were screened; 306 were randomized. Terbinafine, 250 mg daily for 3 months (continuous) or terbinafine, 500 mg daily for 1 week per month for 3 months (pulse) was administered. The primary outcome measure was mycological cure of the target toenail at 18 months. Secondary outcome measures included clinical cure and complete (clinical plus mycological) cure of the target toenail and complete cure of all 10 toenails.

Results

Results of an intent-to-treat analysis did not meet the prespecified criterion for noninferiority but did demonstrate the superiority of continuous-dose terbinafine for: mycological cure of the target toenail (70.9% [105/148] vs 58.7% [84/143]; P =.03, relative risk [RR] of 1.21 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.43]); clinical cure of the target toenail (44.6% [66/148] vs 29.3% [42/143]; P =.007, RR=1.52 [95% CI, 1.11-2.07); complete cure of the target toenail (40.5% [60/148] vs 28.0% [40/143]; P =.02, RR=1.45 [95% CI, 1.04-2.01); and complete cure of all 10 toenails (25.2% [36/143] vs 14.7% [21/143]; P =.03, RR=1.71 [95% CI, 1.05-2.79). Tolerability of the regimens did not differ significantly between the groups (χ2=1.63; P =.65).

Limitations

The study population primarily consisted of older men with severe onychomycosis.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the superiority of continuous- over pulse-dose terbinafine. We also found this expensive therapy to be much less effective than previously believed, particularly for achieving complete cure of all 10 toenails.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


 The opinions and assertions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Deparment of Veterans Affairs.
Funding sources: Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center and its Health Services Research Center of Excellence on Chronic Disease Outcomes Research. Dr Warshaw's career has been supported by a VA Cooperative Studies Clinical Research Career Development Award.
Disclosure: Dr Warshaw has conducted research trials for several pharmaceutical companies, including Dermik, Paddock, Altana, Coloplast, and Novartis.
Reprints not available from the authors.


© 2005  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 53 - N° 4

P. 578-584 - ottobre 2005 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Epidemiology of psoriatic arthritis in the population of the United States
  • Joel M. Gelfand, Dafna D. Gladman, Philip J. Mease, Nana Smith, David J. Margolis, Tamar Nijsten, Robert S. Stern, Steven R. Feldman, Tara Rolstad
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Ocular pemphigus
  • Yassine J. Daoud, Rene Cervantes, C. Stephen Foster, A. Razzaque Ahmed

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.