Abbonarsi

Needle-knife sphincterotomy: factors predicting its use and the relationship with post-ERCP pancreatitis (with video) - 22/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.024 
Adam A. Bailey, MBChB, FRACP, Michael J. Bourke, MBBS, FRACP , Arthur J. Kaffes, MBBS, FRACP, Karen Byth, PhD, Eric Y. Lee, MBBS, FRACP, Stephen J. Williams, MBBS, FRACP, MD
Current affiliations: Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (A.A.B., M.J.B., A.J.K., E.Y.L., S.J.W.), Westmead Hospital, (K.B.), Westmead Millennium Institute, Sydney, Australia 

Reprint requests: Dr Michael J. Bourke, Endoscopy Unit, Westmead Hospital, Corner Darcy and Hawkesbury Roads, Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2143 Australia.

Sydney, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Background

In the absence of precut needle-knife sphincterotomy (NKS), failure of biliary cannulation may occur in up to 10% of cases. There are few prospective evaluations of the safety and efficacy of NKS, and studies of its early use in difficult cannulation have been inconclusive. Whether precut NKS after failure of primary biliary cannulation is independently associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) remains controversial.

Objective

To examine the relationship between NKS and PEP.

Design

Analysis of prospectively collected data from two randomized trials of ERCP techniques, with PEP as the primary endpoint measure.

Setting

Tertiary-care academic medical center.

Patients

This study involved 732 patients from two successive, prospective, randomized trials of naïve papilla cannulation between November 2001 and April 2006. Patients with pancreatic or ampullary cancer were excluded.

Intervention

Naïve papilla cannulation, NKS, primary guidewire versus contrast-assisted cannulation, and glyceryl trinitrate patch versus placebo.

Main Outcome Measurements

PEP and procedure-related complications.

Results

NKS was performed in 94 of 732 patients (12.8%) and was successful in achieving bile duct access in 80 of 94 patients (85%). Cannulation success in the entire group was 717 of 732 patients (97.7%). The overall frequency of PEP following NKS was 14.9% (14 of 94 patients) compared with 6.1% (39 of 638 patients) without NKS (P < .001). The incidence of PEP increased with an increasing number of attempts at cannulating the papilla. Pancreatic stents were inserted in 22 patients, 5 of whom developed pancreatitis. In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of PEP were as follow: female sex (odds ratio [OR] = 3.5, P = .028), suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) (OR = 9.7, P < .001), partial pancreatic drainage (OR = 4.8, P = .011), 10 to 14 attempts at papilla cannulation (OR = 4.4, P = .031), and ≥15 attempts at papilla cannulation (OR = 9.4, P = .013). NKS was not an independent predictor of PEP. There were no perforations, no major bleeding, and no cases of severe pancreatitis in the NKS group.

Limitations

Nonrandomized for NKS intervention.

Conclusions

The number of attempts at cannulating the papilla is independently associated with PEP, and the risk increases with an increasing number of attempts. NKS is not an independent predictor of PEP.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abbreviations : GTN, NKS, OR, PEP, SOD


Mappa


 DISCLOSURE: All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
 See CME section; p. 365
 If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr. Bailey at adamabailey@gmail.com.


© 2010  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 71 - N° 2

P. 266-271 - febbraio 2010 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Survival in patients with pancreatic cancer after the diagnosis of malignant ascites or liver metastases by EUS-FNA
  • John DeWitt, Menggang Yu, Mohamad A. Al-Haddad, Stuart Sherman, Lee McHenry, Julia K. LeBlanc
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Needle-knife sphincterotomy and post-ERCP pancreatitis: time to lower the threshold for the needle?
  • Tony C.K. Tham, Jo Vandervoort

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.