Abbonarsi

Carbon dioxide insufflation during ERCP for reduction of postprocedure pain: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial - 23/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.050 
John T. Maple, DO , Rajesh N. Keswani, MD, R. Mark Hovis, CRNA, Esmat Z. Saddedin, MD, Sreenivasa Jonnalagadda, MD, Riad R. Azar, MD, Clint Hagen, MS, David M. Thompson, PhD, Lawrence Waldbaum, MD, Steven A. Edmundowicz, MD
Current affiliations: Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition (J.T.M.), Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (C.H., D.M.T.), University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Division of Gastroenterology (R.N.K.), Department of Anesthesiology (R.M.H., L.W.), Division of Gastroenterology (E.Z.S., S.J., R.R.A., S.A.E.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA 

Reprint requests: John T. Maple, DO, Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, 920 Stanton L. Young Blvd, WP1360, Oklahoma City, OK 73117.

St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Abstract

Background

Abdominal pain after ERCP is common, and although it is frequently nonspecific and self-limited, it may provoke concern for complications and thus distress both patients and physicians. Carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation during ERCP may reduce abdominal distension in comparison to insufflation of air, resulting in less pain.

Objective

To compare the incidence and severity of post-ERCP pain in patients receiving CO2 versus air insufflation during ERCP.

Design

Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

Setting

University medical center.

Patients

This study involved consecutive patients presenting for ERCP, excluding those with significant preprocedure pain or obstructive lung disease.

Intervention

Randomization to insufflation with air or CO2; all other care was identical.

Main Outcome Measurements

Pre-ERCP and post-ERCP pain and nausea were assessed by using a 0 to 10 visual analogue scale. Patient waist circumferences were measured before and after procedures.

Results

One hundred patients (82 outpatients, 51 women, mean age 54.4 years, 50 randomized to CO2) completed the study. The CO2 and air groups were similar in regard to demographics, indication for ERCP, and procedure duration. The mean pain score 1 hour post-ERCP was higher with air than with CO2 insufflation (1.9 vs 0.7, P = .01). Similarly, the incidence of any pain at 1 hour post-ERCP was higher with air than with CO2 (48% vs 28%, P = .04). The mean increase in waist circumference was greater with air than with CO2 (2.1 cm vs 0.3 cm, P = .003). Adverse events were infrequent and did not differ by group. No serious cardiopulmonary complications occurred.

Limitations

Single-center, selected patient population.

Conclusion

Insufflation of CO2 during ERCP reduces postprocedure pain and abdominal distension in comparison to insufflation of air. The use of CO2 in deeply sedated, prone patients appears to be safe.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abbreviations : CO2, SOD, VAS


Mappa


 DISCLOSURE: All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
 See CME section; p. 369.
 If you want to chat with an author of this article, you may contact him at john-maple@ouhsc.edu.


© 2009  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 70 - N° 2

P. 278-283 - agosto 2009 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Resource-intensive endoscopy: revenue source or cash drain?
  • Gavin C. Harewood, Wayne Stemmer, Joel Roth, Irving Waxman
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • A comparison of metal and plastic stents for the relief of jaundice in unresectable malignant biliary obstruction in Korea: an emphasis on cost-effectiveness in a country with a low ERCP cost
  • Won Jae Yoon, Ji Kon Ryu, Ki Young Yang, Woo Hyun Paik, Jun Kyu Lee, Sang Myung Woo, Joo Kyung Park, Yong-Tae Kim, Yong Bum Yoon

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.