Abbonarsi

Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy - 23/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.gie.2007.11.043 
Thomas F. Imperiale, MD , Elizabeth A. Glowinski, RN, Beth E. Juliar, MS, MA, Faouzi Azzouz, MS, David F. Ransohoff, MD
Current affiliations: Division of Gastroenterology (T.F.I.), Division of Biostatistics (B.E.J., F.A.), Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Regenstrief Institute, Inc (T.F.I.), Indianapolis Gastroenterology Research Foundation (E.A.G.), Indianapolis, Indiana, Department of Medicine (D.F.R.), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA 

Reprint requests: Thomas F. Imperiale, MD, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN 46202.

Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Abstract

Background

Variation in polyp detection among endoscopists has been used to justify the need for establishing quality standards for colonoscopy performance.

Objective

To measure variation in polyp detection rates (PDRs) among endoscopists who perform screening colonoscopy and to identify associated factors.

Design

Cross-sectional analysis of summary-level data.

Setting

Endoscopy practices in central Indiana.

Subjects

Twenty-five endoscopists and their patients.

Main Outcome Measurements

Mean procedure time (MPT); proportions of patients with any polyp, any adenoma, any polyp ≥1.0 cm, and multiple adenomas; and variation in PDRs and identification of outliers. Multiple linear regression analysis identified factors that accounted for the variation in PDRs.

Results

A total of 2664 screening colonoscopies (1108 women and 1556 men) were performed. The mean patient age was 59 years; the mean proportion of women was 42%; the MPT was 17.1 minutes. Adenoma detection rates ranged from 7% to 44% (P < .001) and from 0% to 13% for large polyps, which was not statistically significant (P = .07). For all polyp categories, only 1 to 3 high outlier endoscopists (ie, higher than mean PDRs) were identified. Models that included the number of procedures, mean age, percentage of women, and MPT accounted for 36% to 56% of the variation in PDRs. In all models, only MPT was significantly associated with PDRs.

Limitations

Whether each endoscopist’s cohort was at comparable risk for colorectal neoplasia was uncertain. In comparison with individual-level data, analysis of summary-level data is limited.

Conclusions

PDRs vary widely among endoscopists, although only a few (high) outliers were identified. Variation in PDRs was associated only with MPT. Further research is needed to determine the clinical importance of and reasons for this variation.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abbreviations : MPT, PDR, RR


Mappa


 DISCLOSURE: All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication. Grant support: NIH grant K24 DK 002756.
 See CME section; p. 1350.


© 2009  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 69 - N° 7

P. 1288-1295 - giugno 2009 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • From iatrogenic digestive perforation to complete anastomotic disunion: endoscopic stenting as a new concept of “stent-guided regeneration and re-epithelialization”
  • Laila Amrani, Charles Ménard, Stéphane Berdah, Olivier Emungania, Phillipe Ah Soune, Clément Subtil, Christian Brunet, Jean-Charles Grimaud, Marc Barthet
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Inequities in colonoscopy: variation in performance and outcomes of colonoscopy
  • Harminder Singh, Gurkirpal Singh

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.