Abbonarsi

Resuscitating the physician-patient relationship: emergency department communication in an academic medical center - 25/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.02.035 
Karin V. Rhodes, MD ⁎ , Teri Vieth, BA, MBA, Theresa He, BA, Annette Miller, RN, David S. Howes, MD, Olivia Bailey, BS, James Walter, MD, Richard Frankel, PhD, Wendy Levinson, MD
From the Health Services Research Group (Rhodes), Section of Emergency Medicine (Miller, Howes, Walter), University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; the University of Chicago/Pritzker School of Medicine (Vieth, He, Bailey), Chicago, IL; the Indiana University School of Medicine (Frankel), Indianapolis, IN; The Regenstrief Institute (Frankel), Indianapolis, IN; and the Department of Medicine (Levinson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 

Address for reprints: Karin V. Rhodes, MD, Section of Emergency Medicine, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 5068, Room L545, Chicago, IL 60637; 773-834-7467, fax 773-702-3135

Abstract

Study objective

We characterize communication in an urban, academic medical center emergency department (ED) with regard to the timing and nature of the medical history survey and physical examination and discharge instructions.

Methods

Audiotaping and coding of 93 ED encounters (62 medical history surveys and physical examinations, 31 discharges) with a convenience sample of 24 emergency medicine residents, 8 nurses, and 93 nonemergency adult patients.

Results

Patients were 68% women and 84% black, with a mean age of 45 years. Emergency medicine providers were 70% men and 80% white. Of 62 medical history surveys and physical examinations, time spent on the introduction and medical history survey and physical examination averaged 7 minutes 31 seconds (range 1 to 20 minutes). Emergency medicine residents introduced themselves in only two thirds of encounters, rarely (8%) indicating their training status. Despite physician tendency (63%) to start with an open-ended question, only 20% of patients completed their presenting complaint without interruption. Average time to interruption (usually a closed question) was 12 seconds. Discharge instructions averaged 76 seconds (range 7 to 202 seconds). Information on diagnosis, expected course of illness, self-care, use of medications, time-specified follow-up, and symptoms that should prompt return to the ED were each discussed less than 65% of the time. Only 16% of patients were asked whether they had questions, and there were no instances in which the provider confirmed patient understanding of the information.

Conclusion

Academic EDs present unique challenges to effective communication. In our study, the physician-patient encounter was brief and lacking in important health information. Provision of patient-centered care in academic EDs will require more provider education and significant system support.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


 Author contributions: KVR, WL, RF, and JW conceived the study and designed the trial. KVR, WL, and DSH obtained funding. KVR, TH, OB, and AM were responsible for data collection and database management. KVR, TH, TV were responsible for data analysis. KVR and TH wrote the first draft, and KVR and TV wrote the final version, with input from RF and DSH. All authors reviewed final versions, but KVR takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
 Presented as an abstract at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine annual meeting, Atlanta, GA, May 2001.
 Funded in the preliminary phases of a randomized controlled trial by the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ HS11096-02).
 Dr. Rhodes is supported by a career development award from the National Institute of Mental Health (K23/PA-00-004).


© 2004  American College of Emergency Physicians. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 44 - N° 3

P. 262-267 - settembre 2004 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Health care facility and community strategies for patient care surge capacity
  • John L. Hick, Dan Hanfling, Jonathan L. Burstein, Craig DeAtley, Donna Barbisch, Gregory M. Bogdan, Stephen Cantrill
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Variation in communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department
  • Rosemary Spencer, Enrico Coiera, Pamela Logan

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.