Mammographic breast density during hormone replacement therapy: Differences according to treatment - 08/09/11
Abstract |
Objective: Our purpose was to investigate the effects of various hormone replacement regimens on mammographic breast density. Study Design: Mammographic density was recorded in women participating in a population-based screening program. All women were nonusers of hormone replacement therapy at first mammogram and thereafter reported continuous use of the same treatment: estrogen alone (n = 50) or estrogen in cyclic (n = 75) or continuous (n = 50) combination with progestogen. Mammographic density was quantified according to the Wolfe classification. Results: An increase in mammographic density was much more common among women receiving continuous combination hormone replacement therapy (52%) than among those receiving cyclic (13%) and estrogen-only (18%) treatment. The increase in density was apparent already at first visit after the start of hormone replacement therapy. There was little change in mammographic status during long-term follow-up. Conclusion: Regimens of hormone replacement therapy were shown to have different effects on the normal breast. There is an urgent need to clarify the biologic nature and significance of a change in mammographic density during treatment and, in particular, its relation to symptoms and breast cancer risk. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:348-52.)
Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.Keywords : Hormone replacement therapy, mammographic changes, breast density
Mappa
| From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologya and the Department of Radiology,b Karolinska Hospital, and the Department of Radiology, Höglandssjukhuset.c |
|
| Supported by grants from the Swedish Medical Research Council (No. 05982), by Cancerfonden, and by funds from the Karolinska Institutet. |
|
| Reprint requests: Eva Lundström, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Hospital, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden. |
|
| 0002-9378/99 $8.00 + 0 6/1/98327 |
Vol 181 - N° 2
P. 348-352 - agosto 1999 Ritorno al numeroBenvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.
Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?
