Abbonarsi

A meta-analysis of specifically designed randomized trials of sirolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease - 07/10/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.07.003 
Sebastian Kufner, MD a, i, ⁎ , Antoinette de Waha, MD a, i, Fabrizio Tomai, MD b, Seong-Wook Park, MD c, Seung-Whan Lee, MD c, Do-Sun Lim, MD d, Moo Hyun Kim, MD e, Anders M. Galloe, MD f, Michael Maeng, MD g, Carlo Briguori, MD h, Alban Dibra, MD a, Albert Schömig, MD a, Adnan Kastrati, MD a
a Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany 
b Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, European Hospital, Rome, Italy 
c Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea 
d Cardiovascular Center, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, South Korea 
e Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, South Korea 
f Roskilde Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark 
g Department of Cardiology B, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Aarhus, Denmark 
h Laboratory of Interventional Cardiology and Department of Cardiology, Clinica Mediterranea, Naples, Italy 

⁎Reprint requests: Sebastian Kufner, MD, ISAResearch Center, Deutsches Herzzentrum, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636 Munich, Germany.

Riassunto

Background

There is an ongoing debate on the optimal drug-eluting stent (DES) in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease. We addressed this issue by making a synthesis of the available evidence on the relative long-term efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in these patients.

Methods

Individual patient data were analyzed from 6 randomized trials specifically designed to compare SES with PES in diabetic patients. In total, 1183 patients were followed up for a median of 3.9 years (25th, 75th percentiles 3.4-4.5 years). The primary efficacy end point was target lesion revascularization (TLR). The composite of death and myocardial infarction (MI) was the primary safety end point. Stent thrombosis was a secondary end point. Overall hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were calculated as summary estimates.

Results

No significant heterogeneity was seen across the 6 randomized trials for all analyzed events. Sirolimus-eluting stent was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of TLR (HR 0.65 [0.47-0.91], P = .01). No significant differences were observed regarding the risk of death or MI (HR 1.04 [0.74-1.45], P = .83) and stent thrombosis (HR 1.00 [0.31-3.30], P = .67). Mortality was also not affected by the type of DES (HR 0.95 [0.65-1.39], P = .79).

Conclusions

In diabetic patients with coronary artery disease, SES leads to a sustained reduction in the risk of TLR compared with PES. Both these DES types are, however, comparable with respect to the risk of stent thrombosis, MI, or death over long-term follow-up.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


© 2011  Mosby, Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 162 - N° 4

P. 740-747 - ottobre 2011 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Prasugrel overcomes high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in chronic coronary artery disease patients more effectively than high dose (150 mg) clopidogrel
  • Dimitrios Alexopoulos, Ioanna Xanthopoulou, Periklis Davlouros, Theodora-Eleni Plakomyti, Aggeliki Panagiotou, Eleni Mavronasiou, George Hahalis
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Predictors of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and anemia: An analysis of the Trial to Reduce cardiovascular Events with Aranesp (darbepoetin-alfa) Therapy (TREAT)
  • John J.V. McMurray, Hajime Uno, Petr Jarolim, Akshay S. Desai, Dick de Zeeuw, Kai-Uwe Eckardt, Peter Ivanovich, Andrew S. Levey, Eldrin F. Lewis, Janet B. McGill, Patrick Parfrey, Hans-Henrik Parving, Robert M. Toto, Scott D. Solomon, Marc A. Pfeffer

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.