Abbonarsi

On-demand endoscopic CO2 insufflation with feedback pressure regulation during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) peritoneoscopy induces minimal hemodynamic and respiratory changes - 20/07/12

Doi : 10.1016/j.gie.2011.10.015 
Ricard Navarro-Ripoll, MD 1, Graciela Martínez-Pallí, MD, PhD 1, 5, Carlos Guarner-Argente, MD 2, Henry Córdova, MD 2, Maria Angels Martínez-Zamora, MD, PhD 3, Jaume Comas, MD 4, Cristina Rodríguez de Miguel 2, Mireia Beltrán 1, Antonio Rodríguez-D'Jesús, MD 2, Clara Hernández-Cera, MD 1, Josep Llach, MD, PhD 2, 5, 6, Jaume Balust, MD 1, Glòria Fernández-Esparrach, MD, PhD 2, 5, 6,
1 Anesthesiology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain 
2 Endoscopy Unit, Institut Clinic de Malalties Digestives i Metaboliques, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain 
3 Gynecology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain 
4 Surgical Department, ICMDiM, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain 
5 Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain 
6 Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en el Área temática de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Barcelona, Spain 

Reprint requests: Glòria Fernández-Esparrach, MD, PhD, Endoscopy Unit, Hospital Clinic, Villarroel 170, CP-08036 Barcelona, Spain

Riassunto

Background

Endoscopic insufflation has been associated with marked increase in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and hemodynamic and respiratory changes during transgastric surgery.

Objective

To investigate the hemodynamic and respiratory effects during intraperitoneal cavity exploration through 3 different natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) access locations compared with laparoscopy.

Design and Setting

Survival experiments using 40 female pigs randomized to transgastric, transcolonic, transvaginal, and laparoscopic peritoneoscopy.

Interventions

On-demand endoscopic insufflation of CO2 with feedback pressure regulation was used in NOTES with a maximum pressure of 14 mm Hg. In the laparoscopy group, the IAP was maintained at 14 mm Hg. NOTES procedures were performed by an endoscopist (with the assistance of a gynecologist in the transvaginal group and a second endoscopist in the transgastric and transrectal groups) and laparoscopy by 2 surgeons.

Main Outcome Measurements

Invasive hemodynamic and respiratory data. Blood samples were drawn for gas analyses.

Results

All experiments except one in the transrectal group were completed. The IAP was significantly lower in all NOTES groups compared with the laparoscopy group. A significant increase in mean systemic arterial blood pressure was observed in the laparoscopy group at 15 and 30 minutes of intraperitoneal cavity exploration, but it remained unchanged during all NOTES procedures. An increase in airway pressures was observed at 15 and 30 minutes of peritoneoscopy in the animals undergoing laparoscopy, whereas those parameters remained unchanged in the NOTES groups. The laparoscopy group showed a significant impairment in pulmonary gas exchange (decrease in Pao2, increase in Paco2, and decrease in arterial pH) after 30 minutes of peritoneoscopy, whereas only a slight increase in Paco2 was observed in the transrectal and transvaginal groups.

Limitations

Healthy animal model.

Conclusion

On-demand endoscopic insufflation of CO2 with feedback pressure regulation can minimize the risk of hemodynamic and respiratory compromise caused by acute changes in IAP.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abbreviations : IAP, NOTES


Mappa


 DISCLOSURE: The authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication. This research project was supported by a grant from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI08/900).


© 2012  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 76 - N° 2

P. 388-395 - agosto 2012 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Inspection on instrument insertion during colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
  • David G. Hewett, Douglas K. Rex
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Continuing Medical Education Exam: August 2012
  • Raquel E. Davila, Jeffrey H. Lee, William Ross, Shou-Jiang Tang, G.S. Raju, Glenn M. Eisen

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.