Abbonarsi

Comorbidities significantly impact patients’ preferences for psoriasis treatments - 11/08/12

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.08.023 
Astrid Schmieder, MD a, , Marthe-Lisa Schaarschmidt a, Nasir Umar, MSc b, Darcy D. Terris, PhD b, c, Matthias Goebeler, MD a, d, Sergij Goerdt, MD a, Wiebke K. Peitsch, MD a,
a Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany 
b Mannheim Institute of Public Health, Social and Preventive Medicine and the Competence Center for Social Medicine and Occupational Health Promotion, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany 
c Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 
d Department of Dermatology, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany 

Reprint requests: Astrid Schmieder, MD, Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68135 Mannheim, Germany.Correspondence to: Wiebke K. Peitsch, MD, Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68135 Mannheim, Germany.

Abstract

Background

Non-adherence rates are high among patients with psoriasis, partly because of discordance between recommended treatments and individual preferences.

Objectives

Our aim was to assess the impact of comorbidities on patients’ preferences for psoriasis treatments.

Methods

A computer-based conjoint analysis experiment was conducted to analyze preferences of patients with psoriasis (N = 163) for treatment outcome attributes (probability, magnitude and duration of benefit; probability, severity and reversibility of side effects) and process attributes (treatment location, frequency, duration, delivery method, individual cost). The impact of comorbidities (psoriatic arthritis, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and depression) on relative importance scores of each attribute was assessed by analyses of variance, post hoc test, and multivariate regression analysis.

Results

Among the participants included (58.9% males, mean age 49.3 yrs), 27% suffered from psoriatic arthritis, 13.5% from cardiovascular disease, 8% from diabetes, and 12.9% from depression. Preferences for treatment attributes varied significantly depending on comorbidities. Participants with psoriatic arthritis cared most about the probability of benefit (β 0.166; P = .037), whereas those participants with cardiovascular disease were highly concerned about the probability of side effects (β 0.179; P = .046). For participants with depression, treatment duration (β 0.163; P = .047), and individual cost (P = .023) were highly important.

Limitations

Only patients with moderate and severe psoriasis treated at a university medical center were included.

Conclusions

Integrating patients’ preferences into shared decision-making may facilitate treatment adherence and optimize outcomes. Addressing patients’ comorbidities, particularly depression, may be a currently neglected opportunity to improve care.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Key words : adherence, cardiovascular disease, conjoint analysis, depression, diabetes, preferences, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis

Abbreviations used : ANOVA, CA, CASPAR, DLQI, PUVA, PASI, RIS, SD


Mappa


 Funding sources: None.
 Conflicts of interest: None declared.


© 2011  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 67 - N° 3

P. 363-372 - settembre 2012 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Are patients with psoriasis being screened for cardiovascular risk factors? A study of screening practices and awareness among primary care physicians and cardiologists
  • Kory K. Parsi, Elizabeth A. Brezinski, Tzu-Chun Lin, Chin-Shang Li, April W. Armstrong
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Recommendations and current practices for the reconstitution and storage of botulinum toxin type A
  • Austin Liu, Alastair Carruthers, Joel L. Cohen, William P. Coleman, Jeffrey S. Dover, C. William Hanke, Ronald L. Moy, David M. Ozog

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.