Abbonarsi

Potential synergy between advanced primary stroke centers and level I or II trauma centers in the United States - 28/09/12

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.12.024 
Asif A. Khan, MD a, b, , Saqib A. Chaudhry, MD a, Ameer E. Hassan, DO a, Gustavo J. Rodriguez, MD a, M. Fareed K. Suri, MD a, Kamakshi Lakshminarayan, MD, PhD a, Adnan I. Qureshi, MD a
a Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA 
b Department of Neurology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216-4505, USA 

Corresponding author. Department of Neurology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, MS 39216-4505, USA. Tel.: +1 601 984 5500; fax: +1 601 984 5503.

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study is to determine the number of primary stroke centers (PSCs) that exist concurrently (synergic relationship) with designated higher level trauma centers (level I or level II trauma centers) and associated characteristics.

Methods

We identified all PSCs certified by the Joint Commission or local state authorities in 2010. Concurrently, all the higher level trauma centers (designated level I or level II) were identified using data collected from the trauma information exchange program. Additional data was collected from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American hospital directory.

Results

A total of 788 existing designated PSCs were identified in 2010; coexisting PSC-trauma centers were found in 252 centers (32%) with PSCs coexisting with level I trauma centers in 138 hospitals (17.5%). The remaining 536 PSCs (68%) are based in hospitals without trauma centers. There was a higher proportion of residency training programs including neurology, neurosurgery, and general surgery in coexisting PSC-trauma centers (P < .001). In a proof-of-concept analysis in 1 state, PSCs with level I trauma facilities were found to have the highest rates of thrombolytic administration as compared with PSCs with level II trauma centers and PSCs without trauma facilities (12.8% vs 3.8% vs 4.9%)(P < .0001). Primary stroke centers with level I trauma facilities were also more likely to follow the drip-and-ship paradigm (5.7% vs 1.8% vs 0.9%) (P < .0001).

Conclusions

Despite evidence of higher capability among institutions with coexisting PSC-trauma centers, two thirds of PSCs are in hospitals without advanced trauma systems. These findings have implications for establishing stroke systems in the United States.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


 Financial Disclosure: Asif A. Khan, none; Saqib A. Chaudhry, none; Ameer E. Hassan, none; Gustavo J. Rodriguez, none; M. Fareed K. Suri has received funding from National Institutes of Health 5K12-RR023247-05; Kamakshi Lakshminarayan, none; Adnan Qureshi has received funding from National Institutes of Health RO-1-NS44976-01A2 (medication provided by ESP Pharma) and 1U01NS062091-01A2, American Heart Association Established Investigator Award 0840053N, and Minnesota Medical Foundation, Minneapolis, MN.


© 2012  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 30 - N° 8

P. 1535-1539 - ottobre 2012 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • National representation in the emergency medicine literature: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals
  • Qiang Li, Yuan Jiang, Mao Zhang
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • The difference in myocardial injuries and mitochondrial damages between asphyxial and ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrests
  • Min-Shan Tsai, Chien-Hua Huang, Shang-Ho Tsai, Chia-Ying Tsai, Huei-Wen Chen, Hsaio-Ju Cheng, Chiung-Yuan Hsu, Tzung-Dau Wang, Wei-Tien Chang, Wen-Jone Chen

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.