Abbonarsi

External laryngeal manipulation does not improve the intubation success rate by novice intubators in a manikin study - 15/11/12

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.01.010 
Nir Samuel, MD a, Karyn Winkler b, Shuny Peled, MD a, Baruch Krauss, MD c, Itai Shavit, MD a,
a Department of Pediatric Emergency, Rambam Health Care Campus, Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, 31096, Israel 
b Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, 31096, Israel 
c Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital Boston and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA 

Corresponding author. 369 P.O. B Nahariya, Israel, 22103. Tel.: +972 50 2063239.

Abstract

Background

External laryngeal manipulation (ELM) is a technique used in cases of poor glottic view in direct laryngoscopy. Studies investigating ELM in the pediatric population are lacking. The objective of this study was to examine if use of ELM by inexperienced intubators improves the success rate of pediatric intubation.

Methods

We conducted a randomized, controlled, manikin study comparing intubation using ELM (study subjects) with standard intubation (controls). Study participants were paramedic students. Each participant performed 1 intubation attempt on 3 different pediatric airway manikins, independently. If an optimal Cormack-Lehane glottic view (CLGV) of more than 2 has been obtained, study subjects were previously instructed to perform the intubation using ELM; controls were instructed to continue with standard intubation. Outcome measures were single-attempt intubation success rate, preintubation CLGV, and duration of intubation.

Results

The study group included 13 subjects who performed 39 intubations. In 19 intubations, CLGV of more than 2 had been obtained; and ELM was used. The control group included 14 subjects who performed 42 intubations. In 20 intubations, CLGV of more than 2 was obtained. Median CLGV score improved from 3.5 before ELM to 2 when ELM was used. However, no difference was found between the groups in intubation success rate (10/19 vs 14/20, P = .43); and the duration of intubation was significantly shorter in controls (25.8 vs 37.8 seconds, P < .007).

Conclusions

In this pediatric manikin study, ELM performed by novice intubators improved laryngeal view, but lengthened the duration of intubation and did not improve intubation success rate.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


 Author contributions information: N.S. conceived the idea for the study, designed the study, collected the data, and drafted the manuscript. K.W. assisted in creating the study design and in data collection. S.P. assisted in data collection. B.K. critically reviewed the manuscript. I.S. designed the study, drafted the manuscript, performed the statistical analysis, and reviewed the literature. I.S. has full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.


© 2012  Elsevier Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 30 - N° 9

P. 2005-2010 - novembre 2012 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Lack of efficacy of phenytoin in children presenting with febrile status epilepticus
  • Salima Ismail, Arielle Lévy, Helena Tikkanen, Marcel Sévère, Franciscus Johannes Wolters, Lionel Carmant
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • To-Go medications for decreasing ED return visits
  • Bryan D. Hayes, Leila Zaharna, Michael E. Winters, Agnes Ann Feemster, Brian J. Browne, Jon Mark Hirshon

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.