Abbonarsi

Carbon dioxide insufflation does not reduce pain scores during colonoscope insertion in unsedated patients: a randomized, controlled trial - 20/12/12

Doi : 10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.012 
Peng-Jen Chen, MD, Chung-Hsien Li, MD, Tien-Yu Huang, MD, PhD, Yu-Lueng Shih, MD, PhD, Heng-Cheng Chu, MD, PhD, Wei-Kuo Chang, MD, PhD, Tsai-Yuan Hsieh, MD, PhD
Division of Gastroenterology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan 

Reprint requests: Tsai-Yuan Hsieh, MD, PhD, Division of Gastroenterology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, No. 325, Sec. 2, Chenggong Road, Neihu District, Taipei City 114, Taiwan

Riassunto

Background

CO2 is rapidly absorbed from the colon and eliminated via the lung. Insufflation of CO2 instead of air during colonoscopy can reduce distention-induced pain.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of CO2 insufflation on pain during intubation and extubation and to identify predictors of pain and discomfort during colonoscope insertion.

Design

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Setting

Single tertiary medical center in Taiwan.

Patients

A total of 193 patients enrolled from September 2010 through June 2011.

Interventions

Colonoscope insertion with either air or CO2 insufflation. CO2 was used for extubation in both groups.

Main Outcome Measurements

The main outcome measurement was pain, recorded on a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) for left-sided colonoscope insertion and right-sided colonoscope insertion and at 1, 3, 6, and 24 hours post-procedure. Colonoscope cecal intubation time and extubation time, completeness of intubation, and loop formation were also assessed.

Results

CO2 insufflation during colonoscope intubation was used in 98 patients and air in 97 patients. The mean pain scores during intubation were low (2-3) for patients undergoing air insufflation and were not reduced further in patients receiving CO2. A mean pain score of 0 was reported by both groups for all postprocedure time points. Multivariate analysis identified sex, loop formation of the sigmoid colon, time to reach the transverse colon, and requested sedation as factors that significantly affect VAS pain scores.

Limitations

This study was limited in scope to a single medical center with experienced endoscopists.

Conclusions

We detected no significant benefit to the use of CO2 insufflation compared with air insufflation during intubation for colonoscopy performed by experienced colonoscopists. The absence of postprocedure pain in both groups supports previous observations that CO2 insufflation during extubation is effective in reducing postprocedure pain. Female sex and loop formation were identified as key factors influencing pain scores on colonoscope insertion. (Clinical trial registration number: TSGHIRB-099-05-081.)

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abbreviations : BMI, IQR, VAS


Mappa


 DISCLOSURE: This study was supported by the research foundation of Tri-Service General Hospitals (TSGH-C99-062). The authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.


© 2013  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 77 - N° 1

P. 79-89 - gennaio 2013 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance
  • Hank S. Wang, Joseph Pisegna, Rusha Modi, Li-Jung Liang, Mary Atia, Minh Nguyen, Hartley Cohen, Gordon Ohning, Martijn van Oijen, Brennan M.R. Spiegel
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Carbon dioxide insufflation reduces number of postprocedure admissions after endoscopic resection of large colonic lesions: a prospective cohort study
  • Milan S. Bassan, Bronte Holt, Alan Moss, Stephen J. Williams, Rebecca Sonson, Michael J. Bourke

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.