Abbonarsi

Use of a single-balloon enteroscope compared with variable-stiffness colonoscopes for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in liver transplant patients with Roux-en-Y biliary anastomosis - 19/03/13

Doi : 10.1016/j.gie.2012.11.031 
Nabeel Azeem, MD 1, James H. Tabibian, MD 2, Todd H. Baron, MD 2, ⁎, Vwaire Orhurhu, MSII 3, Charles B. Rosen, MD 4, Bret T. Petersen, MD 2, Christopher J. Gostout, MD 2, Mark D. Topazian, MD 2, Michael J. Levy, MD 2
1 Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA 
2 Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA 
3 College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA 
4 Division of Transplantation Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA 

Reprint requests: Todd H. Baron, MD, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905

Riassunto

Background

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) is technically challenging in liver transplant patients with Roux-en-Y biliary anastomosis. The optimal endoscope for such cases remains unknown.

Objective

Compare efficacy and safety of performing ERC in liver transplant patients with Roux-en-Y biliary anastomosis by using an adult colonoscope (AC), a pediatric colonoscope (PC), and a single-balloon enteroscope (SBE).

Design

Retrospective chart review.

Setting

Tertiary-care referral center.

Patients

Liver transplant patients with Roux-en-Y biliary anastomoses.

Intervention

ERC with AC, PC, and SBE.

Main Outcome Measurements

Rates of reaching the afferent limb and biliary anastomosis; rates of cannulation; rates of diagnostic, therapeutic, and procedural success; and number of adverse events.

Results

Ninety patients underwent 199 ERCs from 2002 to 2012; 86 with an AC, 55 with a PC, and 58 with an SBE. Biliary cannulation and diagnostic, therapeutic, and procedural success rates were all significantly higher with an SBE than with a PC. Among patients undergoing the initial ERC, no statistical difference was found among SBE, the PC, and an AC. However, the rate of procedural success with SBE during initial ERC over the last 4 years has increased. Of 25 total failures with ACs, exchange for SBEs resulted in procedural success in 4 of 4 attempts. Of 22 failures with a PC, exchange for an SBE resulted in success in 3 of 4 cases. Of 4 failures with SBE exchange in 6 cases (4 to AC, 2 to PC), SBE resulted in success in only 1. No adverse events occurred directly related to type of endoscope.

Limitations

Retrospective study, single center, lack of standardized approach to selection of endoscopes, uncontrolled variables (general anesthesia, learning curve).

Conclusion

In liver transplant patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy, rates of biliary cannulation, therapeutic success, and procedural success are higher with use of an SBE than with a PC and tend to be higher compared with use of an AC among the overall cohort. Use of an SBE and procedural success rates with SBEs have increased over the last 4 years. Failed cases with either an AC or PC can be completed if exchanged for an SBE.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abbreviations : AC, ERC, PC, PTC, SBE


Mappa


 DISCLOSURE: T. Baron received travel support from Olympus. B. Peterson is a consultant for Olympus America. C. Gostout did sponsored research for Olympus America. No other financial relationships relevant to this publication were disclosed.
 If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Baron at [email protected].


© 2013  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 77 - N° 4

P. 568-577 - aprile 2013 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Competency in EUS: is it the curriculum, test, trainer, or trainee?
  • Alireza Sedarat, Michael L. Kochman
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • EUS elastography for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis
  • Mei Mei, Jingmei Ni, Dan Liu, Piaopiao Jin, Leimin Sun

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.