Abbonarsi

Ultrasonographically Guided Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation of Children and Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis - 21/03/13

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.11.014 
Jeffrey Heinrichs a, , Zachary Fritze a, Ben Vandermeer, BSc, MSc b, Terry Klassen, MD, MSc, FRCPC c, Sarah Curtis, MD, MSc, FRCPC a
a Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 
b Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 
c Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada 

Address for correspondence: Jeffrey Heinrichs

Riassunto

Study objective

Peripheral intravenous cannulation is procedurally challenging and painful. We perform a systematic review to evaluate ultrasonographic guidance as an aid to peripheral intravenous cannulation.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, www.ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google.ca. We included randomized trials evaluating ultrasonographically guided peripheral intravenous cannulation and reporting risk of peripheral intravenous cannulation failure, number of attempts, procedure time, or time from randomization to peripheral intravenous cannulation. We separately analyzed pediatric and adult data and emergency department (ED), ICU, and operating room data. Quality assessment used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.

Results

We identified 4,664 citations, assessed 403 full texts for eligibility, and included 9 trials. Five had low risk, 1 high risk, and 3 unclear risk of bias. A pediatric ED trial found that ultrasonography decreased mean difference (MD) in the number of attempts (MD −2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI] −2.73 to −1.27) and procedure time (MD −8.10 minutes; 95% CI −12.48 to −3.72 minutes). In an operating room pediatric trial, ultrasonography decreased risk of first-attempt failure (risk ratio 0.23; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.69), number of attempts (MD −1.50; 95% CI −2.52 to −0.48), and procedure time (MD −5.95; 95% CI −10.21 to −1.69). Meta-analysis of adult ED trials suggests that ultrasonography decreases the number of attempts (MD −0.43; 95% CI −0.81 to −0.05). Ultrasonography decreased risk of failure (risk ratio 0.47; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.87) in an adult ICU trial.

Conclusion

Ultrasonography may decrease peripheral intravenous cannulation attempts and procedure time in children in ED and operating room settings. Few outcomes reached statistical significance. Larger well-controlled trials are needed.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. Dr. Curtis received support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
 Please see page 455 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.
 Supervising editor: Peter C. Wyer, MD.
 Author contributions: TK and SC conceived the review and obtained research funding. JH and SC designed the review and wrote the protocol. JH and ZF acquired the data. JH, ZF, BV, and SC analyzed and interpreted the data. JH drafted the article. All authors critically revised the article for important intellectual content. JH, ZF, and BV performed statistical analysis. SC supervised the review. JH takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
 Publication date: Available online February 15, 2013.
 A 29DGKY8 survey is available with each research article published on the Web at www.annemergmed.com.
 A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.


© 2012  Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 61 - N° 4

P. 444 - aprile 2013 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Video Capsule Endoscopy in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Study of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
  • Andrew C. Meltzer, M. Aamir Ali, Roderick B. Kresiberg, Gayatri Patel, Jeff P. Smith, Jesse M. Pines, David E. Fleischer
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Are Thrombolytics Indicated for Pulmonary Embolism?
  • Melinda J. Morton, Rodney Omron

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.