Abbonarsi

Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by cardiac magnetic resonance is greater in patients with strict vs nonstrict electrocardiogram criteria for left bundle-branch block - 23/05/13

Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.03.013 
Linus G. Andersson a, b, Katherine C. Wu, MD c, Björn Wieslander a, b, Zak Loring, BS d, e, Terry F. Frank c, Charles Maynard, PhD f, Gary Gerstenblith, MD c, Gordon F. Tomaselli, MD c, Robert G. Weiss, MD c, Galen S. Wagner, MD b, Martin Ugander, MD, PhD a, David G. Strauss, MD, PhD a, d,
a Department of Clinical Physiology, Cardiac MR Group, Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden 
b Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, MD 
c Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 
d Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 
e Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 
f Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 

Reprint requests: David G. Strauss, MD, PhD, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, 62-1126, Silver Spring, MD 20993.

Riassunto

Background

Left bundle-branch block (LBBB) is a marker of increased delay between septal and left ventricular (LV) lateral wall electrical activation and is a predictor of which patients will benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy. Recent analysis has suggested that one-third of patients meeting the conventional electrocardiogram criteria for LBBB are misdiagnosed, and new strict LBBB criteria have been proposed. We tested the hypothesis that patients with strict LBBB have greater LV mechanical dyssynchrony than do patients meeting the nonstrict LBBB criteria, whereas there is no difference between patients with nonstrict LBBB and LV conduction delay with a QRS duration of 110 to 119 ms.

Methods

Sixty-four patients referred for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators underwent 12-lead electrocardiogram and cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial tagging. The patients were classified as strict LBBB, nonstrict LBBB, or non-LBBB (nonspecific LV conduction delay with a QRS duration of 110-119 ms). The time delay between septal and lateral LV wall peak circumferential strain (septal-to-lateral wall delay) was measured by cardiac magnetic resonance.

Results

Patients with strict LBBB (n = 31) had a greater septal-to-lateral wall delay compared with patients with nonstrict LBBB (n = 19) (210 ± 137 ms vs 122 ± 102 ms, P = .045). There was no significant difference between nonstrict LBBB and non-LBBB (n = 14) septal-to-lateral wall delay (122 ± 102 ms vs 100 ± 86 ms, P = .51).

Conclusions

Strict LBBB criteria identify patients with greater mechanical dyssynchrony compared with patients only meeting the nonstrict LBBB criteria, whereas there was no significant difference between patients with nonstrict LBBB and non-LBBB. The greater observed LV dyssynchrony may explain why patients with strict LBBB have a better response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


 Anne B. Curtis, MD, FACC, served as guest editor for this article.
 Financial support: The study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health (HL103812 to K.C.W., HL91062 to G.F.T., and HL61912 to R.G.W.), the DW Reynolds Foundation and the Food and Drug Administration Critical Path Initiative.


© 2013  Mosby, Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 165 - N° 6

P. 956-963 - giugno 2013 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Atrial fibrillation among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with sepsis: Incidence and risk factors
  • Allan J. Walkey, Melissa A. Greiner, Susan R. Heckbert, Paul N. Jensen, Jonathan P. Piccini, Moritz F. Sinner, Lesley H. Curtis, Emelia J. Benjamin
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Liberal versus restrictive transfusion thresholds for patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease
  • Jeffrey L. Carson, Maria Mori Brooks, J. Dawn Abbott, Bernard Chaitman, Sheryl F. Kelsey, Darrell J. Triulzi, Vankeepuram Srinivas, Mark A. Menegus, Oscar C. Marroquin, Sunil V. Rao, Helaine Noveck, Elizabeth Passano, Regina M. Hardison, Thomas Smitherman, Tudor Vagaonescu, Neil J. Wimmer, David O. Williams

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.