Abbonarsi

Left bundle-branch block: The relationship between electrocardiogram electrical activation and echocardiography mechanical contraction - 28/07/13

Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.04.005 
Niels Risum, MD, PhD a, , David Strauss, MD b, Peter Sogaard, MD, DMSc c, Zak Loring, MD b, d, Thomas Fritz Hansen, MD a, Niels Eske Bruun, MD, DMSc a, Galen Wagner, MD d, Joseph Kisslo, MD d
a Department of Cardiology, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark 
b Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 
c Faculty of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark 
d Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 

Reprint requests: Niels Risum, MD, Department of Cardiology P, Gentofte University Hospital, DK 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.

Riassunto

Background

The relationship between myocardial electrical activation by electrocardiogram (ECG) and mechanical contraction by echocardiography in left bundle-branch block (LBBB) has never been clearly demonstrated. New strict criteria for LBBB based on a fundamental understanding of physiology have recently been independently published for both ECG and echocardiography. The relationship between the 2 modalities and the relation to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response was investigated.

Methods

Sixty-six patients with LBBB by conventional criteria had a standard 12-lead ECG and 2-dimensional strain echocardiography performed before CRT implantation. Criteria for LBBB by echocardiography included early termination of contraction in one wall and prestretch and late contraction in opposing wall(s). New strict criteria by ECG included QRS duration ≥140 ms (men) or 130 ms (women), QS or rS in leads V1 and V2, and mid-QRS notching or slurring in ≥2 of leads V1, V2, V5, V6, I, and aVL. Response was defined as >15% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume after 6 months.

Results

In 64 of 66 patients, ECG analysis was possible. Echo and ECG readings for LBBB presence were concordant in 54 (84%) of 64. Thirty-seven (82%) of 45 patients with LBBB by strict ECG criteria responded to CRT, whereas only 4 (21%) of the 19 patients without LBBB responded (sensitivity 90% and specificity 65%). Thirty-six (95%) of 38 patients with concordance for the presence of LBBB responded to CRT. In patients with concordance for the absence of LBBB, 15 (94%) of 16 did not respond.

Conclusion

For the first time, a close relation has been demonstrated between electrical activation by ECG and mechanical contraction by echocardiography. These findings may help identify CRT candidates.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


© 2013  Mosby, Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 166 - N° 2

P. 340-348 - agosto 2013 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • The forgotten lead: Does aVR ST-deviation add insight into the outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients?
  • Aws Alherbish, Cynthia M. Westerhout, Yuling Fu, Harvey D. White, Christopher B. Granger, Galen Wagner, Paul W. Armstrong
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Early intravenous heart failure therapy and outcomes among older patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure: Findings from the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Registry Emergency Module (ADHERE-EM)
  • Yee Weng Wong, Gregg C. Fonarow, Xiaojuan Mi, W. Frank Peacock, Roger M. Mills, Lesley H. Curtis, Laura G. Qualls, Adrian F. Hernandez

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.