Abbonarsi

Development, reliability, and validity of a novel Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) - 18/12/13

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.09.041 
Clement C.H. Loh, BSc Med (Hons I) a, h, Jaehwan Kim, MD, PhD a, h, John C. Su, MBBS, M Epi, FRACP, FACD, FAAD b, c, d, Benjamin S. Daniel, BA, BCom, MBBS, MMed (Clin Epi) e, h, Supriya S. Venugopal, MBBS, MMed (Clin Epi) f, h, Lesley M. Rhodes, RN, RM, ACN a, Lizbeth R.A. Intong, MD, DPDS a, h, Matthew G. Law, MA, MSc, PhD g, h, Dedee F. Murrell, MA (Cambridge), BMBCh (Oxford), FAAD, MD, FACD a, h, ⁎
a Department of Dermatology, St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia 
b Epidermolysis Bullosa Clinic, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia 
c Department of Pediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia 
d Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia 
e Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia 
f Department of Dermatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia 
g Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia 
h Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia 

∗Reprint requests: Dedee F. Murrell, MA (Cambridge), BMBCh (Oxford), FAAD, MD, FACD, Department of Dermatology, St George Hospital, Gray Street, Kogarah, Sydney, NSW 2217, Australia.

Abstract

Background

There is a lack of validated standardized outcome measures for epidermolysis bullosa (EB) that can separate activity from damage.

Objective

We sought to develop and validate an instrument for inherited EB of all ages and subtypes, the EB Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI), which scores activity responsive to therapy separately from scarring.

Methods

The EBDASI was validated by comparing its reliability and validity against the Birmingham EB Severity (BEBS) score (partially validated with activity mixed with scarring), using the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scale as a reference measurement. Sixteen patients with EB (7 EB simplex, 5 dominant dystrophic EB [DDEB], 2 junctional EB, and 2 recessive dystrophic EB) were assessed by 5 EB experts using the EBDASI, BEBS, and PGA, and data from 9 additional patients assessed on an ad hoc basis during routine patient clinic were also included.

Results

For interrater reliability, the overall total score intraclass correlation coefficients (95% confidence intervals) were: EBDASI 0.964 (0.929-0.986), BEBS 0.852 (0.730-0.937), and PGA 0.873 (0.765-0.946). For intrarater reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficients were: EBDASI 0.994 (0.976-0.998), BEBS 0.926 (0.748-0.981), and PGA 0.932 (0.764-0.982). The EBDASI had a higher correlation with PGA (ρ = 0.871) than BEBS with PGA (ρ = 0.852). Intraclass correlation coefficients scatterplots showed the EBDASI was better at distinguishing milder forms of EB, with better correlations at higher severity scores than the BEBS.

Limitations

A limited number of patients were recruited for this study. An independent study will be required to demonstrate the responsiveness of the EBDASI.

Conclusion

The EBDASI demonstrated excellent reliability and validity, as compared with 2 other outcome measures.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Key words : epidermolysis bullosa, Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index, outcome measure, reliability, severity score, validation

Abbreviations used : BEBS, CI, EB, EBDASI, ICC, PDAI, PGA, QOL, QOLEB


Mappa


 Supported by Caroline Quinn Trust (grant to Dr Murrell), Premier Dermatology R&D, Foote Family donation to the Lord Mayor's Trust Fund, Victoria, the Australasian Blistering Diseases Foundation, Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Research Association New Zealand, Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Research Association Australia, Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Research Association New South Wales (Australia), Japanese Society for Investigative Dermatology (Mr Loh), and University of New South Wales Medicine Honors Research Program (for Mr Loh to spend a year studying with Dr Murrell).
 Conflicts of interest: None declared.
 Supplementary figures are available at www.jaad.org.


© 2013  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 70 - N° 1

P. 89 - gennaio 2014 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • H syndrome: The first 79 patients
  • Vered Molho-Pessach, Yuval Ramot, Frances Camille, Victoria Doviner, Sofia Babay, Siekavizza Juan Luis, Valentina Broshtilova, Abraham Zlotogorski
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Successful therapeutic transplantation of revertant skin in epidermolysis bullosa
  • Antoni Gosty?ski, Anna M.G. Pasmooij, Marcel F. Jonkman

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.