Abbonarsi

A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of prescribed patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal on adenoma detection - 16/07/14

Doi : 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.032 
George Ou, MD, Edward Kim, MD, FRCPC, Pardis Lakzadeh, BSc, Jessica Tong, BSc, Robert Enns, MD, FRCPC, Alnoor Ramji, MD, FRCPC, Scott Whittaker, MD, FRCPC, Hin Hin Ko, MD, FRCPC, Brian Bressler, MD, MS, FRCPC, Lawrence Halparin, MD, FRCPC, Eric Lam, MD, FRCPC, Jack Amar, MD, FRCPC, Jennifer Telford, MD, MPH, FRCPC
 Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 

Reprint requests: Jennifer Telford, MD, MPH, FRCPC, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Division of Gastroenterology, St. Paul's Hospital, Pacific Gastroenterology Associates, Suite 770, 1190 Hornby Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6Z 2K5.

Abstract

Background

High-quality colonoscope withdrawal technique is associated with a higher adenoma detection rate. Position change is routinely used in barium enema and CT colonography to facilitate adequate distension of the colon and promote movement of fluid from the segment of the colon being assessed.

Objective

To determine whether prescribed position changes during colonoscope withdrawal affect the adenoma detection rate compared with the usual care per endoscopist.

Design

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Setting

Tertiary-care, university-affiliated hospital.

Patients

Patients referred for outpatient colonoscopy between July 2011 and July 2012 were evaluated for eligibility. Inclusion criteria were outpatient status and age ≥40 years. Exclusion criteria were (1) complete colonoscopy within 1 year before the procedure, (2) inability to provide informed consent, (3) incomplete colonoscopy to the cecum, (4) previous bowel resection, (5) inflammatory bowel disease, (6) colonic polyposis syndrome, (7) inadequate bowel preparation, and (8) musculoskeletal disorder or other mobility issues limiting effective patient position changes during colonoscopy.

Interventions

Prescribed position changes during colonoscope withdrawal.

Main Outcome Measurements

Polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR).

Results

A total of 776 patients were enrolled, with 388 in the dynamic group. There was no difference in PDR (odds ratio [OR] 0.99; P = .93) or ADR (OR 1.17; P = .28). Colonoscope withdrawal time was longer in the dynamic group (median time 466.5 vs 422.5 seconds; P < .0001).

Limitations

Single-center study. Indication for procedure not controlled. Lack of standardized bowel preparation and blinding.

Conclusion

Prescribed position changes during colonoscope withdrawal do not affect polyp/adenoma detection compared with the usual practice when the baseline ADR is above the recommended standard. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01395173.)

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abbreviations : ADR, PDR


Mappa


 DISCLOSURE: All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
 If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Telford at jtelford29@gmail.com.
 See CME section; p. 311.


© 2014  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 80 - N° 2

P. 277 - agosto 2014 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness
  • Audrey H. Calderwood, Paul C. Schroy, David A. Lieberman, Judith R. Logan, Michael Zurfluh, Brian C. Jacobson
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Readability, suitability, and health content assessment of web-based patient education materials on colorectal cancer screening
  • Chenlu Tian, Sara Champlin, Michael Mackert, Allison Lazard, Deepak Agrawal

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.