Abbonarsi

Secukinumab retreatment-as-needed versus fixed-interval maintenance regimen for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: A randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial (SCULPTURE) - 17/06/15

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.04.011 
Ulrich Mrowietz, MD a, , Craig L. Leonardi, MD b, Giampiero Girolomoni, MD c, Darryl Toth, MD, FRCPC d, Akimichi Morita, MD e, Shyamal A. Balki, FCPS f, Jacek C. Szepietowski, MD g, Pascaline Regnault, PhD h, Helen Thurston, MSc h, Charis Papavassilis, MD h
for the

SCULPTURE Study Group

a Psoriasis Center, Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany 
b Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri 
c Section of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy 
d XLR8 Medical Research, Windsor, Ontario, Canada 
e Department of Geriatric and Environmental Dermatology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan 
f Shree Hospital and Critical Care Center, Nagpur, India 
g Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland 
h Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland 

Correspondence to: Ulrich Mrowietz, MD, Psoriasis Center, Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Schittenhelmstr. 7, Kiel 24105, Germany.

Abstract

Background

Secukinumab has demonstrated high, sustained efficacy in psoriasis to 52 weeks on a fixed-interval regimen.

Objective

We sought to compare a retreatment-as-needed versus a fixed-interval regimen.

Methods

In this double-blind study, adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were randomized 1:1 to subcutaneous secukinumab at 300 mg (n = 484) or 150 mg (n = 482) weekly from baseline until week 4, and at week 8. At week 12, patients achieving 75% or more improvement from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 75) were rerandomized to 2 dose levels of secukinumab retreatment as needed (n = 217, 300 mg; n = 206, 150 mg) or fixed interval (n = 217; n = 203). Primary end point was noninferiority of retreatment as needed versus fixed interval for maintaining PASI 75 to week 52.

Results

Secukinumab induced high responses by week 12 (84.4%-91.1% PASI 75 responders). From week 12 to week 52, more patients on fixed interval (78.2%, 300 mg; 62.1%, 150 mg) maintained PASI 75 versus retreatment as needed (67.7%; 52.4%); statistical noninferiority of retreatment as needed was not established. Overall safety, including very low incidences of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies (<0.5%), was similar between regimens.

Limitations

The primary end point was developed without any known precedent.

Conclusion

Secukinumab fixed interval showed clear benefit versus the study-specified retreatment-as-needed regimen for maintaining efficacy. Both regimens exhibited safety consistent with previous trials. The potential of retreatment as needed with secukinumab warrants further investigation.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Key words : clinical trial, dosing, immunogenicity, noninferiority, psoriasis, retreatment as needed, secukinumab

Abbreviations used : AE, DLQI, IGA, PASI, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100, QOL, SCULPTURE, STATURE


Mappa


 Study funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. It was designed by the scientific steering committee and Novartis personnel. Investigators collected data, Novartis conducted data analyses, and all authors had access to data. The initial draft of the manuscript was written by a medical writer compensated by Novartis. All authors had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
 Disclosure: The authors received writing and editorial support from Barry Weichman and Jinling Wu in the preparation of the manuscript from BioScience Communications, New York, NY, supported by Novartis. Dr Mrowietz has served as advisor and/or received speaker honoraria and/or received grants and/or participated in clinical trials for Abbott/AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, BASF, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Centocor, Eli Lilly, Forward Pharma, Galderma, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Medac, MSD, Miltenyi Biotech, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva, VBL, and Xenoport. Dr Leonardi has served as consultant and/or investigator and/or participated in a speaker's bureau for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Stiefel, and UCB. Dr Girolomoni has received advisory/speaker honoraria and/or research funding from AbbVie, Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Dompé, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Merck Serono, Maruho, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer. Dr Toth has served as investigator for Novartis, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Abbott, Celgene, Merck, Galderma, and Leo Pharma. Dr Morita has served as consultant and/or paid speaker for and/or participated in psoriasis clinical trials sponsored by AbbVie, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Janssen, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Kyowa-Kirin, Leo Pharma, Maruho, and MSD. Dr Szepietowski has served as advisor and/or received speakers honoraria and/or participated in clinical trials for Abbott/AbbVie, Actavis, Amgen, BASF, Astellas, Berlin-Chemie/Menarini, Biogenetica International Laboratories, Centocor, Fresenius, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Takeda, Toray Corporation, and Vichy. Dr Regnault, Ms Thurston, and Dr Papavassilis are employees of and/or own stock in Novartis. Dr Balki has no conflicts of interest to declare.
 Reprints not available from the authors.


© 2015  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 73 - N° 1

P. 27 - luglio 2015 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Change of Address
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor, in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results of a phase III, randomized, controlled trial (Efficacy and Safety Trial Evaluating the Effects of Apremilast in Psoriasis [ESTEEM] 1)
  • Kim Papp, Kristian Reich, Craig L. Leonardi, Leon Kircik, Sergio Chimenti, Richard G.B. Langley, ChiaChi Hu, Randall M. Stevens, Robert M. Day, Kenneth B. Gordon, Neil J. Korman, Christopher E.M. Griffiths

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.