Surgical procedural map scoring for decision-making in laparoscopic cholecystectomy - 04/01/19
, C. Gustaf Axelsson b, Cara B. Jones a, Roy Phitayakorn a, b, Emil Petrusa a, b, Sophia K. McKinley a, b, Denise Gee a, b, Carla Pugh cAbstract |
Introduction |
The objective of this study was to determine whether decision-based procedural mapping demonstrates differences in attendings versus residents.
Methods |
Attendings and residents were interviewed about operative decision-making in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) using a cognitive task analysis framework. Interviews were converted into procedural maps. Operative steps, patient factors, and surgeon factors noted by attendings and residents were compared. Two scoring methods were used to compare map structures of attendings versus residents.
Results |
Six attendings and six residents were interviewed. There were no significant differences in the number of patient or surgeon factors identified. Attendings had significantly more operative steps (29.67 ± 1.9 vs. 23.3 ± 1.9, p = 0.04) and crosslinks (3.2 ± 0.5 vs. 1 ± 0.4, p = 0.005) in their maps and a higher total score (90.2 ± 8.4 vs. 63.2 ± 3.8, p = 0.015) than residents.
Conclusion |
LC procedural map scoring for attendings and residents demonstrated significant differences in structural complexity and may provide a useful framework for assessing decision making.
Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.Highlights |
• | Concept maps are graphical tools that allow users to visually organize knowledge. |
• | Procedural maps are modified concept maps designed for procedural knowledge. |
• | Scoring of procedural maps can differentiate attendings versus residents. |
• | Attending maps have more operative steps, decision factors, structural complexity. |
Mappa
Vol 217 - N° 2
P. 356-361 - febbraio 2019 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente
- Malpractice allegations: A reality check for resident physicians
- Beiqun Zhao, Luis C. Cajas-Monson, Sonia Ramamoorthy
- Looks can be deceiving: Gaze pattern differences between novices and experts during placement of central lines
- Hong-En Chen, Cheyenne C. Sonntag, David F. Pepley, Rohan S. Prabhu, David C. Han, Jason Z. Moore, Scarlett R. Miller
Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.
Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?