Abbonarsi

Deep learning for wireless capsule endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis - 21/09/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.039 
Shelly Soffer, MD 1, 2, 3, , Eyal Klang, MD 1, 2, 3, Orit Shimon, MD 2, 4, Noy Nachmias, MD 2, 5, Rami Eliakim, MD 2, 6, Shomron Ben-Horin, MD 2, 6, Uri Kopylov, MD 2, 6, Yiftach Barash, MD 1, 2, 3
1 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel 
2 Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel 
3 DeepVision Lab, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel 
4 Department of Anesthesia, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikvah, Israel 
5 Departments of Internal Medicine D, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel 
6 Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel 

Reprint requests: Shelly Soffer. Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, 5265601, Israel.Sheba Medical CenterTel Hashomer5265601Israel

Abstract

Background and Aims

Deep learning is an innovative algorithm based on neural networks. Wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE) is considered the criterion standard for detecting small-bowel diseases. Manual examination of WCE is time-consuming and can benefit from automatic detection using artificial intelligence (AI). We aimed to perform a systematic review of the current literature pertaining to deep learning implementation in WCE.

Methods

We conducted a search in PubMed for all original publications on the subject of deep learning applications in WCE published between January 1, 2016 and December 15, 2019. Evaluation of the risk of bias was performed using tailored Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted.

Results

Of the 45 studies retrieved, 19 studies were included. All studies were retrospective. Deep learning applications for WCE included detection of ulcers, polyps, celiac disease, bleeding, and hookworm. Detection accuracy was above 90% for most studies and diseases. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for ulcer detection were .95 (95% confidence interval [CI], .89-.98) and .94 (95% CI, .90-.96), respectively. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for bleeding or bleeding source were .98 (95% CI, .96-.99) and .99 (95% CI, .97-.99), respectively.

Conclusions

Deep learning has achieved excellent performance for the detection of a range of diseases in WCE. Notwithstanding, current research is based on retrospective studies with a high risk of bias. Thus, future prospective, multicenter studies are necessary for this technology to be implemented in the clinical use of WCE.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abbreviations : AI, CCE, CCC, WCE


Mappa


 DISCLOSURE: The following authors disclosed financial relationships: R. Eliakim: Speaker for Takeda, Jansen, and Medtronic. S. Ben-Horin: Consultant and advisory board for and research support from AbbVie, MSD, Jansen, Takeda, Pfizer, GSK, and CellTrion. U. Kopylov: Research support from Jannsen, Takeda, and Medtronic; advisory fees from Jannsen, Takeda, Medtronic, Abbvie, Dr Falk, and MSD. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships.
 See CME section, p. 960.
 If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Soffer at soffer.shelly@gmail.com.


© 2020  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 92 - N° 4

P. 831 - ottobre 2020 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Accuracy of artificial intelligence–assisted detection of upper GI lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Thomas K.L. Lui, Vivien W.M. Tsui, Wai K. Leung
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Endoscopic technological innovations for neoplasia detection in organized colorectal cancer screening programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Sreedhari Thayalasekaran, Leonardo Frazzoni, Giulio Antonelli, Lorenzo Fuccio, Franco Radaelli, Alida Andrealli, Carlo Senore, Alessandro Repici, Cesare Hassan, Pradeep Bhandari

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.