Abbonarsi

Dermoscopy report: Proposal for standardization : Results of a consensus meeting of the International Dermoscopy Society - 19/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.02.051 
Josep Malvehy, MD a, , Susana Puig, MD a, Giuseppe Argenziano, MD b, Ashfaq A. Marghoob, MD c, H. Peter Soyer, MD d

on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society Board members

  Board Members of the International Dermoscopy Society: R. Anadolu (Turkey), L. Andreassi (Italy); I. Bartenjev (Slovenia); R. Bergman (Israel); M. Binder (Austria); A. Blum (Germany); J. Bowling (United Kingdom), R. Braun (Switzerland); H. Cabo (Argentina); L. Cabrijan (Croatia); P. Carli (Italy); B. Carlos (Mexico); S. Chimenti (Italy); A. B. Cognetta (United States); R. Corona (Italy); V. De Giorgi (Italy); H. Dong (China); G. Ferrara (Italy); M. Fleming (United States); J. Grichnik (United States); C. Grin-Jorgensen (United States); A. Halpern (United States), R. Hofmann-Wellenhof (Austria); C. Ingvar (Sweden); R. Johr (United States), B. Katz (United States), H. Kerl (Austria); H. Kittler (Austria); A. W. Kopf (United States); J. Kreusch (Germany); D. Langford (New Zealand); B. Li (China); H. Lorentzen (Denmark); A. A. Marghoob (United States); C. Massone (Austria); G. Mazzocchetti (Italy); W. McCarthy (Australia); S. Menzies (Australia); M. Oliviero (United States), F. Özdemir (Turkey); H. Pehamberger (Austria); G. Pellacani (Italy); K. Peris (Italy); A. Perusquia (Mexico); D. Piccolo (Italy); M. A. Pizzichetta (Italy); D. Polsky (United States); H. Rabinovitz (United States), B. Rao (United States); S. Ronger (France); P. Rubegni (Italy); T. Saida (Japan); M. Scalvenzi (Italy); R. Schiffner (Germany); S. Seidenari (Italy); I. Stanganelli (Italy); W. V. Stoecker (United States); W. Stolz (Germany); M. Tanaka (Japan); L. Thomas (France); T. Tsuchida (Japan); S. Q. Wang (United States); K. Westerhoff (Sweden); I. H. Wolf (Austria); I. Zalaudek (Austria).

a From the Dermatology Department, Melanoma Unit, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona 
b Dermatology Department, Second University of Naples 
c Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York 
d Department of Dermatology, University of Graz 

Reprint requests: Josep Malvehy, MD, Department of Dermatology, Hospital Clinic, C/Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.

Barcelona, Spain; Naples, Italy; New York, New York; and Graz, Austria

Abstract

Background

Dermoscopy can assist clinicians in the evaluation and diagnosis of skin tumors. Since dermoscopy is becoming widely accepted and used in the medical community, there is now the need for a standardized method for documenting dermoscopic findings so as to be able to effectively communicate such information among colleagues.

Objectives

Toward this end, the International Dermoscopy Society embarked on creating a consensus document for the standardization and recommended criteria necessary to be able to effectively convey dermoscopic findings to consulting physicians and colleagues.

Methods

The Dermoscopy Report Steering Committee created an extensive list of dermoscopic criteria obtained from an exhaustive search of the literature. A preliminary document listing all the dermoscopic criteria that could potentially be included in a standardized dermoscopy report was elaborated and presented to the members of the International Dermoscopy Society Board in two meetings of the Society and subsequently discussed via Internet communications between members and the Steering Committee.

Results

A consensus document including 10 points categorized as either recommended or optional and a template of the dermoscopy report were obtained. The final items included in the document are as follows: (1) patient’s age, relevant history pertaining to the lesion, pertinent personal and family history (recommended); (2) clinical description of the lesion (recommended); (3) the two-step method of dermoscopy differentiating melanocytic from nonmelanocytic tumors (recommended); (4) the use of standardized terms to describe structures as defined by the Dermoscopy Consensus Report published in 2003. For new terms it would be helpful to provide a working definition (recommended); (5) the dermoscopic algorithm used should be mentioned (optional); (6) information on the imaging equipment and magnification (recommended); (7) clinical and dermoscopic images of the tumor (recommended); (8) a diagnosis or differential diagnosis (recommended); (9) decision concerning the management (recommended); (10) specific comments for the pathologist when excision and histopathologic examination are recommended (optional).

Limitations

The limitations of this study are those that are intrinsic of a consensus document obtained from critical review of the literature and discussion by opinion leaders in the field.

Conclusions

Although it may be acceptable for a consulting physician to only state the dermoscopic diagnosis, the proposed standardized reporting system, if accepted and utilized, will make it easier for consultants to communicate with each other more effectively.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


 Funding sources: None.
Conflicts of interest: None declared.


© 2007  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 57 - N° 1

P. 84-95 - luglio 2007 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Adherence to topical therapy increases around the time of office visits
  • Steven R. Feldman, Fabian T. Camacho, Jennifer Krejci-Manwaring, Christie L. Carroll, Rajesh Balkrishnan
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Diving into the blue: In vivo microscopic characterization of the dermoscopic blue hue
  • Giovanni Pellacani, Sara Bassoli, Caterina Longo, Anna Maria Cesinaro, Stefania Seidenari

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.