Prospective Assessment of the Sexual Function After Greenlight Endoscopic Enucleation and Greenlight 180W XPS Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate - 23/08/19
, Zine-Eddine Khene, Lucas Freton, Grégory Verhoest, Andréa Manunta, Karim Bensalah, Sébastien Vincendeau, Romain MathieuABSTRACT |
Objective |
To evaluate the impact of Greenlight 180W photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) and endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (GreenLEP) on ejaculatory and erectile functions.
Materials and Methods |
Between January 2014 and September 2016, 440 men with low urinary tract symptoms or complications related to benign prostate obstruction with prostate >80 g and sexually active, underwent a PVP or GreenLEP performed by experienced surgeons at a single institution. Patients were matched in a 1:1 fashion according to preoperative transrectal ultrasonography prostatic volume and cardiovascular risk factors (smoking, diabetes, and hypertension).
Results |
One hundred patients in each group were included. Mean prostatic volume were 110 g (95%CI: 101-118) and 107 g (95%CI: 99-115) in the GreenLEP and PVP groups, respectively (P = .68). Mean total energy delivered in the PVP group was 4.42 kJ/g (4.2-4.6). Surgical retreatment was required in 9 patients (10.1%) in the PVP group and none in the GreenLEP group (log rank test: P = .002). Mean prostate specific antigen level and International Prostate Symptom Score score were significantly lower in the GreenLEP group than in the PVP group at 3, 12, and 24 months (P <.001). Preserved antegrade ejaculation was reported in 24 patients (26.9%) in the PVP group vs 1 patient (1.2%) in the GreenLEP group at 12 months (P <.001). In multivariate analysis, age, history of coronary artery disease, and surgical treatment with PVP were independent factors of IIEF-5 decline.
Conclusion |
Despite a poor rate of preserved antegrade ejaculation, GreenLEP was associated with better erectile function outcomes possibly due to greater improvement of low urinary tract symptoms.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Conflicts of Interest: Benoit PEYRONNET and Sébastien VINCENDEAU are consultants for Boston Scientific. Romain Mathieu is an investigator for Boston Scientific. Other authors have nothing to disclose. |
Vol 131
P. 184-189 - septembre 2019 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
